Thanks all of the participant who interested to join EDC and follow all of the procedure to be an EDC member, here the criteria that already considered by the commitee of placement test that already decided the result:
1. Logic Think / Critical Thinking
2. English Language
3. Argument
4. Essay

we already acumulate the score then we count the average score from all. people who get at least 55 deserve to be an EDC member, but we  have another qualification, its who have a good essay. based on those criteria and standard we already found the new EDC's member here the people who passed the test :

No.	Name	Department	Score
1	Syifa Khairunnisa	Eng. Department	72
2	Andrizal	Akuntansi	71
3	Nurul Hidayah	Eng. Department	69
4	Nita Fadilah	Eng. Department	68.5
5	Siti Rahmawati	Eng. Department	67.5
6	Sri Wahyuni	Eng. Department	66.5
7	Novia Anggraeni	Eng. Department	66.5
8	Nur Afni Fatimiah	Eng. Department	66.5
9	Nurul Fitri	Eng. Department	66
10	Desi Aulia	Ilkom	65.5
11	Maria Goldiana Taping	Eng. Department	65
12	Nur Afni Aulia	Ane	65
13	Galih Arya Kusuma	Akuntansi	62.5
14	Wina Afrilia	Eng. Department	62
15	Shinta Sartika	Eng. Department	61.5
16	Elisabeth Maria	Ekbang	61
17	Ade Putri	Hukum	60
18	Ema Aswarini	Agribisnis	59.5
19	Dede Rohmawati	PLS	59.5
20	Rien Reka	Ilkom	59.5
21	Novandra Muhamaddin	Akuntansi	58.5
22	M. Dhuhri Angga	Akuntansi	58.5
23	Akun Tanjung	Ane	58
24	Lila Lolita	Akuntansi	58
25	Amalia Chaerunnisa	Ane	58
26	Neng Ariyanti	Eng. Department	57
27	Vency Nesia Nierwan	Akuntansi	56.5
28	Yasinta B	Akuntansi	56.5
29	Lilian Oktaviani	Eng. Department	56.5
30	Kiki Ayuni	Agribisnis	56
31	Vivit Fitra	Diksat	56
32	Ahmad Wijaya	Akuntansi	55.5
33	Qory Nur F	Perpajakan	55.5
34	Ahmad Fajri Syifaul	Manajemen	54
35	M. Ariff Winarto	Agribisnis	52

For people who get below 55 but still passed it's because their essay is the best essay from all of people who can't passed, so welcome in EDC hope you doing your best in EDC and can appreciate your effort to be an EDC member, be bright in edc, then consistent till the end :D Congratulation~

Sincerely: Admin ~

On 7 oct we was held a monthly intercomp. this is the first our monthly intercomp but it was run succeed. we run 3 round in this intercomp, the first and second round is preliminary and the last round is the final round. In the first round we got this motion THBT  US should fund third world country for moving their citizen to mars. this motion is so complicated when the aff team said that US should fund because the damage on earth the most is caused by US company in every country ex: freeport in indonesia, exxon mobil etc that support an major environmental damage ex : global warming, etc. but the negative team said that this damage is caused by collective, we can't put US as the one country that should fund third word to moving their citizen to mars.

and then in the next round we got a motion THBT obama should lose nobel peace prize. this motion is also complicated to explain while the aff team said that yes obama should lose the nobel peace prize because he not include again in the criteria to be a person that should get nobel peace prize ex: obama attack syirian people with war and it will create third world war because behind the syiria case there's china and russia and then the negative said that no obama shouldn't lose his nobel peace prize because there's a soft way and hard way to maintance a conflict in this world the soft way is with diplomacy and the hard way is attack the problem in a conflict area with war and then maintain a peace can't be achieve with one person, he need another stakeholder to achive that purpose.

and the motion for final round is THW give death penalty to the highest corruption cases of the highest judges, governtment official and parliamentary members in indonesia.
it was an amazing motion in final round while the aff team tend to explained us about the mechanism how to give the death penalty it's self ex: directly shoot in their head, "so they can directly go to hell" said mr. muriece xixixxixi and also tend about deterrent effect that should be exist when this motion implement and then the negative team tend brought about the right of the corruptor it's self while they are gave a criteria of someone who deserve to get death penalty and tried to explain why  highest judges, governtment official and parliamentary not deserve to get death penalty.

so with a long long looooooooooong explanation from 8:00 pm until 4:00 pm we got the winner and best speaker here's jreeeeeeeeng jreeeeeeeeeeeeeng

the winner of 1st monthly intercomp ms Firdha and ms Rika :D

she is the best speaker on our 1st monthly intercomp ms Firdfha :D

finalist of 1st monthly intercomp :D

what are you doing sir? wkwkwkwk

ms ipeh as an adjudicator in that monthly intercomp :D she was graduated from our university then got SH (sarjana hukum) xixixi congratulation mam :D 

it was soooo great day.. hahaha see you in the next monthly intercomp ~